More specifically, Aquilina’s paper will explore how ‘literary eventhood’ may occur in works which, in different ways, fall under the nomenclature associated to electronic literature. Callus’s paper, on the other hand, will focus on the concept of the ‘literary absolute’ to try to discover whether it could bear any consequentiality to current understandings of electronic literature. While both papers will show an awareness of the potential ‘category mistake’ that this may involve, they argue that such attempts are fundamental in discussions of the ‘ends’ of electronic literature. Calleja’s paper will also seek to extend or trespass definitional restrictions by emphasising on the role of imagination in contemporary indie games, which highlights a continuity between print, electronic texts and cybertexts that we too often take for granted.
The approaches being proposed are not colonising discourses. Rather than simply applying terms from literary studies or from game studies to examples of electronic literature, they start from electronic literature (or some modes in which it functions) to speak about concepts which may potentially have a wider scope than it. Our interventions in electronic literature from peripheral starting positions will operate with both the risks and the potential originality that such approaches may bring.
